News and information for those involved in Resource Management issues
    If the Centre can help you in any of these areas - contact us
    The Centre's Activities include:
  • Making submissions on Proposed Planning Documents
  • Dealing with Councils
  • Promoting research
  • Providing expert advice and witnesses
  • Lectures, seminars and training sessions
  • Comment in local newsmedia
  • Examples of submissions on Planning Documents
  • Commentary on current issues
  • Responding to Government Reports and initiatives

Contact Us:
Owen McShane
Director


Centre for Resource
Management Studies

1104 Oneriri Road
R.D. 2
Kaiwaka
Northland
0573
New Zealand
Phone: 64 9 431 2775
Fax: 64 9 431 2775

Mobile: 0274 767 814

To Support Us:
Please Donate
Hits:
Request for Proposed Reforms to RMA, spatial determinism and housing affordability PDF Print E-mail
Centre Digests

Activities.
Request for Further Proposals for the RMA Reform Bill

Items.
Item 1: NBR Column on Spatial Determinism.
Item 2 A Note from Randal O'Toole.

*Entertainment 1:* The Public "Art" of Tyranny
*Entertainment 2:* Assuaging Guilt in the Style of Gore.





Request for Further Proposals for the RMA Reform Bill

A high court in Manitoba Canada has just ruled 
that a municipality can
take a private businessman's land (288 acres of it) for tourism business on the
grounds it can make better use of it than the private land owner. This is even
more worrying than the US Supreme Court ruling because these "British" cases set
stronger precedents for the New Zealand Courts than US decisions. The Centre
would appreciate any ideas on how we can strengthen our property rights to
safeguard New Zealand landowners from such actions. The 'takers' begin with
takings to protect natural landscapes and the like, but it is only a short step
to other interpretations of the public interest. Any thoughts would be appreciated.


ITEMS

Item One: NBR Column on Spatial Determinism.

This column further develops the critique of spatial determinism the Centre 
Presented at the American Dream Coalition Conference in San Jose. In developing
the argument it also mounts the case against mandatory housing as proposed by
our new Minister of Housing, Maryan Street – who is certainly up the wrong
street on this one. Go to:
Spatial Determinism

Item Two: A Note from Randal O'Toole.

If you want to become aware of the connection between Smart Growth, and the 
Sub-prime market to follow the link invitations in Randal's note below. This is
scary reading because the steps taken in the US States which lead to these
hugely overpriced housing markets have been repeated, step by step, in New
Zealand, and those who promoted these actions and legislative changes new
exactly what they were doing and what agenda they were following.

Tomorrow morning, the Cato Institute will publish my latest screed on
the effects of anti-sprawl planning on housing prices. You can
download a preview from here

Feel free to circulate it among friends today, and to anyone tomorrow.

I probobaly would have written the paper a little differently if I
had already seen Wendell Cox's excellent presentation on the same
subject at last month's Preserving the American Dream conference.
Wendell used similar data to present similar ideas but presented them
in some new and compelling ways.

However, I think the Cato paper succeeds in making two important
points. First, the recent housing bubble would not have happened
without anti-sprawl planning laws. Subprime mortgages fed the bubble,
but few would have had to resort to subprime mortgages if anti-sprawl
planning had not placed artificial limits on housing supplies.

Second, the report shows that Edward Glaeser's speculations
that regional governments can keep
housing affordable by forcing cities to allow more housing are
unfounded and, in fact, dangerous. Instead, the report shows that
housing becomes unaffordable when cities gain land-use control over
the rural areas that surround them, and regional governments are an
excellent way for cities to get that control.

If you don't have time to read my whole report, an op-ed length
summary will appear in tomorrow morning's Antiplanner blog. Let me
know if you have any comments.


Entertainment One. (Courtesy of Peter Cresswell's Blog)
Throughout history, it is the deep-pocketed madmen who tend to leave behind 
the biggest wonders. And while last month's election of the New Seven Wonders of
the World hints at this point -- the emperors who fed Christians to the lions in
the Roman Coliseum were neither mild-mannered nor impoverished -- they're
basically positive tributes to mankind's triumphant, enduring half. But what of
the tyranny that drove men to produce such wonders? On some level, each of the
New Seven is also a colossal monument to narcissism, either some ruler or some
culture's desire to go bigger and leave a mark that cannot be erased -- a
sentiment not unlike the one held by some of today's most ruthless dictators.
With that in mind, we created the following list, celebrating those modern
monuments from the totalitarian world that may or may not make it through the
next coup. Check them out while you still can.

Fist Crushing U.S. Fighter Plane, Libya
Monument to President Laurent Kabila, Democratic Republic of Congo
Lenin’s Mausoleum, Russia
Monument to President Saparmurat Niyazov, Turkmenistan
Mao Leading the Chinese People’s Liberation Army, China
The Hands of Victory, Iraq
Monument to the Founding of the North Korean Worker's Party, North Korea

Entertainment Two.
You may have been scandalised by the reports that the 12,000 plus bureaucrats 
descending on Bali to tell us all to reduce GHG emissions will release as much
tonnage of GHGs as 20,000 cars driving for a whole year. Rest assured, CRMS is
taking care of things following in the footprints of Al Gore.
We have our carbon offsets. He purchased his from his own company so paid just
as much as we did for the following.
Owen McShane's Carbon credits 
 

Add this story to Scoopit!.